llm-hallucination-survey

llm-hallucination-survey

大语言模型幻觉问题研究综述

该项目全面调查了大语言模型中的幻觉问题,涵盖评估方法、成因分析和缓解策略。研究包括输入冲突、上下文冲突和事实冲突等多种幻觉类型,并汇总了相关学术文献。项目成果有助于提升大语言模型在实际应用中的可靠性,为该领域的研究和开发提供重要参考。

幻觉大语言模型评估事实一致性自相矛盾Github开源项目

llm-hallucination-survey

<img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Version-1.0-blue.svg" alt="Version"> <img src="https://img.shields.io/github/stars/HillZhang1999/llm-hallucination-survey?color=yellow" alt="Stars"> <img src="https://img.shields.io/github/issues/HillZhang1999/llm-hallucination-survey?color=red" alt="Issues">

Hallucination refers to the generated content that while seemingly plausible, deviates from user input (input-conflicting), previously generated context (context-conflicting), or factual knowledge (fact-conflicting).

<div align="center"> <img src="figures/hallucination_example.png" alt="LLM evaluation" width="300"><br> </div></br> This issue significantly undermines the reliability of LLMs in real-world scenarios.

📰News

😎 We have uploaded a comprehensive survey about the hallucination issue within the context of large language models, which discussed the evaluation, explanation, and mitigation. Check it out!

Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models

If you think our survey is helpful, please kindly cite our paper:

@article{zhang2023hallucination,
      title={Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models}, 
      author={Zhang, Yue and Li, Yafu and Cui, Leyang and Cai, Deng and Liu, Lemao and Fu, Tingchen and Huang, Xinting and Zhao, Enbo and Zhang, Yu and Chen, Yulong and Wang, Longyue and Luu, Anh Tuan and Bi, Wei and Shi, Freda and Shi, Shuming},
      journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.01219},
      year={2023}
}

🚀Table of Content

🔍Evaluation of LLM Hallucination

Input-conflicting Hallucination

This kind of hallucination denotes the model response deviates from the user input, including task instruction and task input. This kind of hallucination has been widely studied in some traditional NLG tasks, such as:

  • Machine Translation:

    • Hallucinations in Neural Machine TranslationDownload Katherine Lee, Orhan Firat, Ashish Agarwal, Clara Fannjiang, David Sussillo [paper] 2018.9
    • Looking for a Needle in a Haystack: A Comprehensive Study of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translation Nuno M. Guerreiro, Elena Voita, André F.T. Martins [paper] 2022.8
    • Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Machine Translation: Model Internal Workings Alone Do Well, Sentence Similarity Even Better David Dale, Elena Voita, Loïc Barrault, Marta R. Costa-jussà [paper] 2022.12
    • HalOmi: A Manually Annotated Benchmark for Multilingual Hallucination and Omission Detection in Machine Translation David Dale, Elena Voita, Janice Lam, Prangthip Hansanti, Christophe Ropers, Elahe Kalbassi, Cynthia Gao, Loïc Barrault, Marta R. Costa-jussà [paper] 2023.05
  • Data-to-text:

    • Controlling Hallucinations at Word Level in Data-to-Text Generation Clément Rebuffel, Marco Roberti, Laure Soulier, Geoffrey Scoutheeten, Rossella Cancelliere, Patrick Gallinari[paper] 2021.2
    • On Hallucination and Predictive Uncertainty in Conditional Language Generation Yijun Xiao, William Yang Wang[paper] 2021.3
    • Faithful Low-Resource Data-to-Text Generation through Cycle Training Zhuoer Wang, Marcus Collins, Nikhita Vedula, Simone Filice, Shervin Malmasi, Oleg Rokhlenko[paper] 2023.7
  • Summarization:

    • On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization Joshua Maynez, Shashi Narayan, Bernd Bohnet, Ryan McDonald[paper] 2020.5
    • Hallucinated but Factual! Inspecting the Factuality of Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarization Meng Cao, Yue Dong, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung[paper] 2021.9
    • Summarization is (Almost) Dead Xiao Pu, Mingqi Gao, Xiaojun Wan[paper] 2023.9
    • Hallucination Reduction in Long Input Text Summarization Tohida Rehman, Ronit Mandal, Abhishek Agarwal, Debarshi Kumar Sanyal[paper] 2023.9
    • Lighter, yet More Faithful: Investigating Hallucinations in Pruned Large Language Models for Abstractive Summarization George Chrysostomou, Zhixue Zhao, Miles Williams, Nikolaos Aletras[paper] 2023.11
    • TofuEval: Evaluating Hallucinations of LLMs on Topic-Focused Dialogue Summarization Liyan Tang, Igor Shalyminov, Amy Wing-mei Wong, Jon Burnsky, Jake W. Vincent, Yu'an Yang, Siffi Singh, Song Feng, Hwanjun Song, Hang Su, Lijia Sun, Yi Zhang, Saab Mansour, Kathleen McKeown[paper] 2024.02
  • Dialogue:

    • Neural Path Hunter: Reducing Hallucination in Dialogue Systems via Path Grounding Nouha Dziri, Andrea Madotto, Osmar Zaiane, Avishek Joey Bose[paper] 2021.4
    • RHO: Reducing Hallucination in Open-domain Dialogues with Knowledge Grounding Ziwei Ji, Zihan Liu, Nayeon Lee, Tiezheng Yu, Bryan Wilie, Min Zeng, Pascale Fung[paper] 2023.7
    • DiaHalu: A Dialogue-level Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models Kedi Chen, Qin Chen, Jie Zhou, Yishen He, Liang He[paper] 2024.3
  • Question Answering:

    • Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answering Shayne Longpre, Kartik Perisetla, Anthony Chen, Nikhil Ramesh, Chris DuBois, Sameer Singh[paper] 2021.9
    • Evaluating Correctness and Faithfulness of Instruction-Following Models for Question Answering Vaibhav Adlakha, Parishad BehnamGhader, Xing Han Lu, Nicholas Meade, Siva Reddy [paper] 2023.7

Context-conflicting Hallucination

This kind of hallucination means the generated content exhibits self-contradiction, i.e., conflicts with previously generated content. Here are some preliminary studies in this direction:

  1. Knowledge Enhanced Fine-Tuning for Better Handling Unseen Entities in Dialogue Generation Leyang Cui, Yu Wu, Shujie Liu, Yue Zhang[paper] 2021.9

  2. A Token-level Reference-free Hallucination Detection Benchmark for Free-form Text Generation Tianyu Liu, Yizhe Zhang, Chris Brockett, Yi Mao, Zhifang Sui, Weizhu Chen, Bill Dolan[paper] 2022.5 (not only limited to context-conflicting type)

  3. Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Context Freda Shi, Xinyun Chen, Kanishka Misra, Nathan Scales, David Dohan, Ed H. Chi, Nathanael Schärli, Denny Zhou[paper] 2023.2

  4. HistAlign: Improving Context Dependency in Language Generation by Aligning with History David Wan, Shiyue Zhang, Mohit Bansal[paper] 2023.5

  5. Self-contradictory Hallucinations of Large Language Models: Evaluation, Detection and Mitigation Niels Mündler, Jingxuan He, Slobodan Jenko, Martin Vechev [paper] 2023.5

Fact-conflicting Hallucination

This kind of hallucination means the generated content conflicts with established facts. This kind of hallucination is challenging and important for practical applications of LLMs, so it has been widely studied in recent work.

  1. TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain Evans [paper] 2022.5

  2. A Token-level Reference-free Hallucination Detection Benchmark for Free-form Text Generation Tianyu Liu, Yizhe Zhang, Chris Brockett, Yi Mao, Zhifang Sui, Weizhu Chen, Bill Dolan [paper] 2022.5

  3. A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity Yejin Bang, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Nayeon Lee, Wenliang Dai, Dan Su, Bryan Wilie, Holy Lovenia, Ziwei Ji, Tiezheng Yu, Willy Chung, Quyet V. Do, Yan Xu, Pascale Fung [paper] 2023.2

  4. HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models Junyi Li, Xiaoxue Cheng, Wayne Xin Zhao, Jian-Yun Nie, Ji-Rong Wen [paper] 2023.5

  5. Automatic Evaluation of Attribution by Large Language Models Xiang Yue, Boshi Wang, Kai Zhang, Ziru Chen, Yu Su, Huan Sun [paper] 2023.5

  6. Adaptive Chameleon or Stubborn Sloth: Unraveling the Behavior of Large Language Models in Knowledge Clashes Jian Xie, Kai Zhang, Jiangjie Chen, Renze Lou, Yu Su [paper] 2023.5

  7. LLMs as Factual Reasoners: Insights from Existing Benchmarks and Beyond Philippe Laban, Wojciech Kryściński, Divyansh Agarwal, Alexander R. Fabbri, Caiming Xiong, Shafiq Joty, Chien-Sheng Wu [paper] 2023.5

  8. Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Large Language Models Through News Summarization Derek Tam, Anisha Mascarenhas, Shiyue Zhang, Sarah Kwan, Mohit Bansal, Colin Raffel [paper] 2023.5

  9. Methods for Measuring, Updating, and Visualizing Factual Beliefs in Language Models Peter Hase, Mona Diab, Asli Celikyilmaz, Xian Li, Zornitsa Kozareva, Veselin Stoyanov, Mohit Bansal, Srinivasan Iyer [paper] 2023.5

  10. How Language Model Hallucinations Can Snowball Muru Zhang, Ofir Press, William Merrill, Alisa Liu, Noah A. Smith [paper] 2023.5

  11. Evaluating Factual Consistency of Texts with Semantic Role Labeling Jing Fan, Dennis Aumiller, Michael Gertz [paper] 2023.5

  12. FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generation Sewon Min, Kalpesh Krishna, Xinxi Lyu, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Pang Wei Koh, Mohit Iyyer, Luke Zettlemoyer, Hannaneh Hajishirzi [paper] 2023.5

  13. Measuring and Modifying Factual Knowledge in Large Language Models Pouya Pezeshkpour [paper] 2023.6

  14. KoLA: Carefully Benchmarking World Knowledge of Large Language Models Jifan Yu, Xiaozhi Wang, Shangqing Tu, Shulin Cao, Daniel Zhang-Li, Xin Lv, Hao Peng, Zijun Yao, Xiaohan Zhang, Hanming Li, Chunyang Li, Zheyuan Zhang, Yushi Bai, Yantao Liu, Amy Xin, Nianyi Lin, Kaifeng Yun, Linlu Gong, Jianhui Chen, Zhili Wu, Yunjia Qi, Weikai Li, Yong Guan, Kaisheng Zeng, Ji Qi, Hailong Jin, Jinxin Liu, Yu Gu, Yuan Yao, Ning Ding, Lei Hou, Zhiyuan Liu, Bin Xu, Jie Tang, Juanzi Li [paper] 2023.6

  15. Generating Benchmarks for Factuality Evaluation of Language Models Dor Muhlgay, Ori Ram, Inbal Magar, Yoav Levine, Nir Ratner, Yonatan Belinkov, Omri Abend, Kevin Leyton-Brown, Amnon Shashua, Yoav Shoham [paper] 2023.7

  16. Fact-Checking of AI-Generated Reports Razi Mahmood, Ge Wang, Mannudeep Kalra, Pingkun Yan [paper] 2023.7

  17. Med-HALT: Medical Domain Hallucination Test for Large Language Models Logesh Kumar Umapathi, Ankit Pal, Malaikannan Sankarasubbu [paper] 2023.7

  18. Large Language Models on Wikipedia-Style Survey Generation: an Evaluation in NLP Concepts

    Fan Gao, Hang Jiang, Moritz Blum, Jinghui Lu, Yuang Jiang, Irene Li [paper] 2023.8

  19. ChatGPT Hallucinates when Attributing Answers Guido Zuccon, Bevan Koopman, Razia Shaik [paper] 2023.9

  20. BAMBOO: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Long Text Modeling Capacities of Large Language Models *Zican Dong, Tianyi Tang, Junyi Li, Wayne Xin Zhao, Ji-Rong

编辑推荐精选

扣子-AI办公

扣子-AI办公

职场AI,就用扣子

AI办公助手,复杂任务高效处理。办公效率低?扣子空间AI助手支持播客生成、PPT制作、网页开发及报告写作,覆盖科研、商业、舆情等领域的专家Agent 7x24小时响应,生活工作无缝切换,提升50%效率!

堆友

堆友

多风格AI绘画神器

堆友平台由阿里巴巴设计团队创建,作为一款AI驱动的设计工具,专为设计师提供一站式增长服务。功能覆盖海量3D素材、AI绘画、实时渲染以及专业抠图,显著提升设计品质和效率。平台不仅提供工具,还是一个促进创意交流和个人发展的空间,界面友好,适合所有级别的设计师和创意工作者。

图像生成AI工具AI反应堆AI工具箱AI绘画GOAI艺术字堆友相机AI图像热门
码上飞

码上飞

零代码AI应用开发平台

零代码AI应用开发平台,用户只需一句话简单描述需求,AI能自动生成小程序、APP或H5网页应用,无需编写代码。

Vora

Vora

免费创建高清无水印Sora视频

Vora是一个免费创建高清无水印Sora视频的AI工具

Refly.AI

Refly.AI

最适合小白的AI自动化工作流平台

无需编码,轻松生成可复用、可变现的AI自动化工作流

酷表ChatExcel

酷表ChatExcel

大模型驱动的Excel数据处理工具

基于大模型交互的表格处理系统,允许用户通过对话方式完成数据整理和可视化分析。系统采用机器学习算法解析用户指令,自动执行排序、公式计算和数据透视等操作,支持多种文件格式导入导出。数据处理响应速度保持在0.8秒以内,支持超过100万行数据的即时分析。

AI工具酷表ChatExcelAI智能客服AI营销产品使用教程
TRAE编程

TRAE编程

AI辅助编程,代码自动修复

Trae是一种自适应的集成开发环境(IDE),通过自动化和多元协作改变开发流程。利用Trae,团队能够更快速、精确地编写和部署代码,从而提高编程效率和项目交付速度。Trae具备上下文感知和代码自动完成功能,是提升开发效率的理想工具。

AI工具TraeAI IDE协作生产力转型热门
AIWritePaper论文写作

AIWritePaper论文写作

AI论文写作指导平台

AIWritePaper论文写作是一站式AI论文写作辅助工具,简化了选题、文献检索至论文撰写的整个过程。通过简单设定,平台可快速生成高质量论文大纲和全文,配合图表、参考文献等一应俱全,同时提供开题报告和答辩PPT等增值服务,保障数据安全,有效提升写作效率和论文质量。

AI辅助写作AI工具AI论文工具论文写作智能生成大纲数据安全AI助手热门
博思AIPPT

博思AIPPT

AI一键生成PPT,就用博思AIPPT!

博思AIPPT,新一代的AI生成PPT平台,支持智能生成PPT、AI美化PPT、文本&链接生成PPT、导入Word/PDF/Markdown文档生成PPT等,内置海量精美PPT模板,涵盖商务、教育、科技等不同风格,同时针对每个页面提供多种版式,一键自适应切换,完美适配各种办公场景。

AI办公办公工具AI工具博思AIPPTAI生成PPT智能排版海量精品模板AI创作热门
潮际好麦

潮际好麦

AI赋能电商视觉革命,一站式智能商拍平台

潮际好麦深耕服装行业,是国内AI试衣效果最好的软件。使用先进AIGC能力为电商卖家批量提供优质的、低成本的商拍图。合作品牌有Shein、Lazada、安踏、百丽等65个国内外头部品牌,以及国内10万+淘宝、天猫、京东等主流平台的品牌商家,为卖家节省将近85%的出图成本,提升约3倍出图效率,让品牌能够快速上架。

下拉加载更多